By Donald L. Swanson “In sum, the walls of the mediation room are remarkably transparent." -- James Coben & Peter Thompson The State of California is studying mediation confidentiality in the context of legal malpractice disputes. Suprise # 1 A surprise of the study is from a 2006 law review article by Coben and Thompson... Continue Reading →
The U.S. Supreme Court and Funny-Money in Credit Bidding Auctions
By: Donald L. Swanson The U.S. Supreme Court has a penchant for rulings that, as a practical matter, screw up our bankruptcy world. The most recent example is the Supreme Court’s March 22, 2017, ruling in the In re Jevic case [see this article]. Another case, where the U.S. Supreme Court did us no favors in... Continue Reading →
In re SunEdison: Mandatory Mediation to the Rescue?
By: Donald L. Swanson “Whereas, mediation may provide an opportunity to consensually resolve the Mediation Issues . . . It Is Therefore, Ordered” that “Representatives of the following parties and their counsel are directed to attend the Mediation in person: (i) the Debtors, (ii) the Committee, . . . [etc.] . . . “ Stuart... Continue Reading →
Student Loan Crisis: High-Priced Colleges Support Beautiful Campuses (and Other Luxuries) on the Backs of their Students
By: Donald L. Swanson “Back when I was in school . . .” This is a tired-old phrase, usually followed by tales of hardship. The Olden Days But here’s an opposite twist: Back when I was in college (during the 1970s), you could actually pay your way through, with little-to-no debt, by working part-time jobs... Continue Reading →
Next Steps for a Court with Basic Mediation Rules: Mandated and Early Mediation
By: Donald L. Swanson Here is a common experience in the bankruptcy courts (and other courts) where mediation is a new or little-used tool: Attorneys have been practicing for years in this court without using mediation. And mediation is slow to catch on. Here’s why: --Attorneys who practice in this court aren’t accustomed to using... Continue Reading →
New Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch Will be Good for Bankruptcy Law
By: Donald L. Swanson The only things I know about Judge (now Justice) Neil Gorsuch are from what I’ve read in two contexts: His rating by the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary, which voted unanimously to give its best possible rating to Judge Gorsuch as a Supreme Court nominee; and Five... Continue Reading →
Puerto Rico Turns to Mediation for Assistance in Solving its Financial Crisis
By Donald L. Swanson “Puerto Rico’s federally appointed financial oversight board scheduled mediation in debt restructuring talks between the U.S. Territory’s general obligation bondholders and holders [of other debts] backed by sales tax revenue.” The mediation “will run from April 10-13 in New York.” --Reuters.com, March 31, 2017, at 11:09 a.m. An hour later, March... Continue Reading →
Structured Dismissal Negotiations are Ripe for Mediation: Until the Supreme Court Upends Precedent (In re Jevic)
By: Donald L. Swanson “We are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final.” --From concurring opinion of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson, in Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 (1953), on role and function of the U.S. Supreme Court. Structured dismissals are [correction: were] a... Continue Reading →
How Frequently Does Malpractice Occur in Mediation?
By Donald L. Swanson California has been studying this question: should a malpractice exception be added to California's mediation confidentiality laws? If, for example, a mediating party sues his/her/its attorney for malpractice committed during a mediation session, should statements made during the mediation session be admissible evidence in the malpractice lawsuit? Or should such statements... Continue Reading →
In re Jevic: Once Again, the Supreme Court Screws Up Our Bankruptcy World — And Justice Thomas is Wise in His Dissent
By: Donald L. Swanson “I think it is unwise for the Court to decide” this issue because: (i) “Experience shows that we would greatly benefit from the view of additional courts of appeals on this question,” and (ii) “We also would have benefited from full, adversarial briefing.” --Justice Clarence Thomas, dissenting in Czyzewski v. Jevic... Continue Reading →