How Mediation Can Be Effective – Even When it Doesn’t Happen

By: Donald L. Swanson Arch Coal, Inc., files bankruptcy on January 11, 2016. By the month of May 2016, the debtor and its creditors are in contentious negotiations over terms of a Chapter 11 plan.  At one point, the parties think they have an agreement in principal, but things fall apart when putting settlement details... Continue Reading →

What Happens to Fraudulent Transfer Claims When Barred by Bankruptcy’s Two-Year Statute of Limitations?

By Donald L. Swanson Two Hypotheticals and a Question: First Hypothetical: Debtor makes a fraudulent transfer shortly before filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy. The Chapter 7 Trustee refuses to pursue the fraudulent transfer claim, and the Bankruptcy Code’s two-year statute of limitations expires. Second Hypothetical: Debtor makes a fraudulent transfer shortly before filing Chapter 11 bankruptcy.... Continue Reading →

How a Judge Makes Mediation Work: Supporting Mediation with Timely Orders

By Donald L. Swanson “We in bankruptcy impair contracts all day, every day . . . That is what we do.” --Judge Steven Rhodes, as quoted by Nathan Bomey in “Detroit Resurrected: To Bankruptcy and Back.” Michigan’s State Constitution provides that public pension rights cannot be impaired.  So, pensioners take the position, in Detroit’s bankruptcy,... Continue Reading →

Romance and “Insider” Status, with Other Oddities, at U.S. Supreme Court (U.S. Bank v. Village at Lakeridge)

By Donald L. Swanson On March 27, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court grants certiorari in the case of U.S. Bank N.A. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC, U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 15-1509. The Facts Kathie Bartlett is one of five owners of a company that owns the Debtor. So, both Kathie Bartlett and her company... Continue Reading →

Mandating Mediation to Develop a Mediation Culture

By:  Donald L. Swanson “[T]he full benefits of mediation are not reaped when parties are left to participate in it voluntarily.” D. Quek, Mandatory Mediation: An Oxymoron? Examining the Feasibility of Implementing a Court-Mandated Mediation Program, Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol 11:479, at 483 (Spring 2010). The article linked above is written by Dorcas... Continue Reading →

U.S. Supreme Court: Stale Claims, Attorneys and Trustees in Chapter 13 & Dissent’s Call for Congress to Overrule (Midland Funding v. Johnson)

By Donald L. Swanson The case is Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson, Supreme Court Case No. 16-348 (decided May 15, 2017).   It’s about creditors filing proofs of stale claims (i.e., claims barred by statute of limitations) in Chapter 13 cases. The Facts Aleida Johnson files Chapter 13 bankruptcy.  Then, Midland files a proof of claim... Continue Reading →

How a Judge Makes Mediation Work: Minimizing Risks in Close-Call and Winner-Take-All Disputes

By Donald L. Swanson “The decision here is most likely all or nothing.  One side is going to win and the other side is going to lose—and that’s going to be very happy on one side and very tough on the other side.” --Judge Steven Rhodes, encouraging parties to reach a settlement, as quoted in... Continue Reading →

U.S. Supreme Court and Its Private Rights v. Public Rights Problem in Bankruptcy (Spokeo v. Robins)

By:  Donald L. Swanson The opinion in the U.S. Supreme Court is Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins (issued on May 16, 2016, in Case No. 13-1339). The Facts of the Case Here are the facts: Spokeo, Inc., operates a “people search engine”: you can search its website for a person’s name and get information about him/her. Spokeo... Continue Reading →

A Proactive Mediator Role: “Special Settlement Master”

By Donald L. Swanson Mediators are appointed as “special masters” in the U.S. District Courts.  Such appointments are authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 53. Examples of Mediators as Special Settlement Masters Mediators appointed as special settlement masters are often given a broad range of authority to act proactively on the court’s behalf. One example is In... Continue Reading →

U.S. Supreme Court: A Tale of Two Certioraris

By Donald L. Swanson These are the best of times, these are the worst of times for 11 U.S.C. § 546(e). § 546(e) provides protection from fraudulent transfer liability in specialized circumstances: e.g., for sales of corporate stock through an intermediary. The “best of times” are because five circuit courts of appeals construe § 546(e)... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑