Time is ticking away (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Can you say, “litigious”? And how about, “abusing the bankruptcy system”? Get this. A Chapter 7 case is pending in the Central California Bankruptcy Court (Case No. 11-bk-11603) that: began on February 7, 2011, with limited assets and a report of no distribution after... Continue Reading →
Does A Creditor Have Standing To Oppose An Involuntary Bankruptcy Petition? (in re Heron Cove)
Standing? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson A creditor does not have standing to oppose an involuntary bankruptcy petition when the debtor fails to do so. That’s the conclusion of In re Heron Cove, LLC, Case No. 3:26-08089, Middle Tennessee Bankruptcy Court (decided June 3, 2026; Doc. 25). What follows is a summary of... Continue Reading →
Applying U.S. Supreme Court’s Judicial Estoppel Opinions (Gaines v. Halliburton)
Estopped? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson On June 11, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court considers the doctrine of judicial estoppel in a bankruptcy case: Kethley v. Buddy Ayers.[Fn. 1]. The issue is: What happens when a bankruptcy debtor fails to disclose a claim against someone else but then attempts to pursue that undisclosed... Continue Reading →
Limited Appellate Review Of Bankruptcy Abstention Decisions (Cal-Tex v. LTM): Part 2
Abstaining? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson This is the second of two articles on abstention in bankruptcy. This article is about appellate review of a decision on bankruptcy abstention. Appellate review of a bankruptcy abstention rulings is limited: denial of a mandatory abstention motion can be appealed; but all other types of abstention... Continue Reading →
How To Apportion A Joint Tax Refund Between Debtor & Non-Debtor Spouses? Five Different Tests (In re Pirron)
Apportioned? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The question in In re Pirron, Case No. 22 B 08555 (Bankry. N.D. Ill., Decided 2/18/2025), is this: How is a tax refund to be allocated between a bankruptcy debtor’s estate and the debtor’s spouse who does not file bankruptcy, when they file a joint tax return?... Continue Reading →
Abstention Under 20 U.S.C. § 1334(c) — Permissive & Mandatory (One William Street v. Wilmington Trust): Part 1
Abstaining? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Here is a bankruptcy abstention ruling: One William Street Capital Master Fund Ltd. V. Wilmington Trust, National Association, Case No. 26-CV-01123, S.D.N.Y. Bankruptcy Court (decided June 5, 2026). This is the first of two articles on abstention. The second article will be on limited appellate review of... Continue Reading →
Curing Home Mortgage Defaults Under A Subchapter V Plan (In re Koetters)
Fixing the defects (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Defaults on home mortgage loans are frequently cured under Chapter 13 plans. But what about defaulted home mortgages in Subchapter V? Here is an opinion dealing with such question: In re Koetters, Case No. 25-80895, Central Illinois Bankruptcy Court (decided May 29, 2026; Doc. 95).... Continue Reading →
One Law Firm Representing Jointly-Administered Debtors: It Doesn’t Always Work (Whitehall v. Lehigh)
Can’t always see it (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings by affiliated entities are common, as is joint administration of their bankruptcy cases with a single law firm representing them all. However, such common representation cannot be taken for granted. Here is an example of it not working: Whitehall Trust... Continue Reading →
Arbitration v. Bankruptcy—And Bankruptcy Prevails! (Harada v. Kapitus)
Has prevailed over many years (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson There is an ongoing effort among bankruptcy courts and their appellate overseers to define the role and enforceability of contracts for arbitration in bankruptcy. An example is from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: Harada Family Dental Care, PC v. Kapitus Servicing, Inc,... Continue Reading →
The Constitutional Mootness Doctrine Described & Applied (Cattle Growers v. U.S. Forest Service)
Cattle where they don't belong (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The equitable mootness doctrine and statutory mootness doctrine get a lot of attention in bankruptcy, but as to the doctrine of constitutional mootness—not so much. Here’s an opinion on constitutional mootness: New Mexico Cattle Growers’ Association v. United States Forest Service, Case No.... Continue Reading →