Involuntary Bankruptcy Filing By Debtor’s Owner/Creditor Is In Good Faith (In re Global Energies—Cert. Denied)

Good faith v. Bad faith? By: Donald L Swanson Is an involuntary bankruptcy, filed by an owner/creditor of the Debtor, filed in good faith or in bad faith? That’s the question before the U.S. Supreme Court on which it denied certiorari on October 30, 2023 (Wortley v. Juranitch, Case No. 23-211). Here’s the gist of the... Continue Reading →

U.S. Trustee’s Unreasonable Crusade Against All Third-Party Releases: The Latest Example (In re Kalos)

A crusade? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The U.S. Trustee is on a crusade to eradicate every type of third-party release from all Chapter 11 bankruptcy plans—no matter what the facts or circumstances might be. It’s a policy based on the idea that, if the Bankruptcy Code doesn’t specifically and explicitly authorize something,... Continue Reading →

“Arising In” Bankruptcy Jurisdiction Over A Malpractice Claim (Murray Energy Holdings)

These buildings are “arising in”? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson A bankruptcy court has jurisdiction to dismiss a legal malpractice claim of non-debtor plaintiffs against non-debtor attorneys. That’s the ruling in Murray v. Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP (In re Murray Energy Holdings Co.), Adv. Pro. No. 22-2007, Southern Ohio Bankruptcy Court (decided... Continue Reading →

Denying Arbitration Of Legal Malpractice Case In Bankruptcy (Murray Energy Holdings)

Request denied? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Bankruptcy Court denies a party’s request to enforce arbitration of a legal malpractice claim—and then dismisses that malpractice claim for failure to state a claim. The opinion is Murray v. Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP (In re Murray Energy Holdings Co.), Adv. Pro. No. 22-2007, Southern... Continue Reading →

Voter Apathy & Consensual v. Non-Consensual Plan Confirmation In Subchapter V (In re Franco’s)

Apathy? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Here’s the latest opinion on a controversial question: In re Franco’s Paving LLC, Case No. 23-20069, Southern Texas Bankruptcy Court, (decided 10/5/2023; Doc. 74). The Question & Answer Voter apathy is a problem in Subchapter V cases.  That apathy is in the form of creditors failing or... Continue Reading →

Our System Of Justice For Mass Tort Cases—Is This The Best We Can Do? (Barden v. Johnson & Johnson)

By: Donald L Swanson Here’s the latest on tort claims against Johnson & Johnson: a $223.8 million judgment against Johnson & Johnson ($37.3 compensatory + $186.5 punitive) in favor of four plaintiffs (i.e., $55.95 million each) is . . . reversed. The reversal opinion is Barden v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., Docket Nos. A-0047-20 thru... Continue Reading →

No Third-Party Releases?  But What About Fraudulent Transfer Claims and Derivative Claims? (Purdue Pharma)

By: Donald L Swanson In Purdue Pharma, the U.S. Supreme Court grants certiorari on this question: “Whether the Bankruptcy Code authorizes a court to approve, as part of a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, a release that extinguishes claims held by nondebtors against nondebtor third parties, without the claimants’ consent” (emphasis... Continue Reading →

Absolute Priority Rule And U.S. Supreme Court — A Refresher (Ahlers & 203 North LaSalle)

An old, long and relatively straight road (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The absolute priority rule [Fn. 1] has been a problem for businesses in bankruptcy—for a very long time!  The rule dates back to at least 1899, when the U.S. Supreme Court prevents certain shareholder actions “until the interests of unsecured creditors... Continue Reading →

Litigating Legacy Debt: “Commercial Or Business Activities” for Subchapter V Eligibility? (In re Fama-Chiarizia)

A different kind of legacy? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson “courts agree that . . . evaluating, asserting, pursuing, and defending litigation claims . . .  can satisfy Section 1182(1)(A)’s requirement of ‘commercial or business activities.’” In re Fama-Chiarizia, Case No. 21-42341, E.D.N.Y. Bankruptcy Court, issued 9/15/2023, Doc. 238, at 37. One of... Continue Reading →

Unconstitutionality of Bankruptcy Administrator Fees; A Remedies Debacle; & No Accountability For Those Responsible (U.S. Trustee v. John Q. Hammons)

From Official Comment to Fed.R.Bankr.P. 9035 By: Donald L Swanson This isn’t going to end well.  Looks like our bankruptcy system in these United States is about to take a big hit—to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars (projected to be around $350 million).  And those responsible for creating the debacle are going to... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑