“Projected Disposable Income” Means What It Says (In re Packet Construction)

It means what it says (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The opinion is In re Packet Construction, LLC, Case No. 23-10860 in the Western Texas Bankruptcy Court (issued April 30, 2024, Doc. 103). Subchapter V Issue & Ruling Here’s the issue raised by the Subchapter V Trustee’s plan objection and the Bankruptcy Court’s... Continue Reading →

Sub V Task Force Report In A Nutshell: Part 3—Compensating Debtor’s Attorney After Debtor Removed From Possession

By: Donald L Swanson On April 23, 2024, the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force issued its Final Report. This article is the third in a series summarizing and condensing the Task Force’s Final Report into “a nutshell.”  The subject in this article is: whether debtor’s attorney can be compensated for services performed after removal... Continue Reading →

Sub V Task Force Report In A Nutshell: Part 2—Future Rents & Eligibility Calculation

By: Donald L Swanson On April 23, 2024, the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force issued its Final Report. This article is the second in a series summarizing and condensing the Task Force’s Final Report into “a nutshell.” The subject of this article is: whether future rents should be included in the debt cap calculation... Continue Reading →

Sub V Task Force Report In A Nutshell: Part 1—Background

By: Donald L Swanson On April 23, 2024, the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force issued its Final Report. This article is the first in a series that summarizes and condenses the Task Force’s Final Report into “a nutshell.” This article: provides background information and data on Subchapter V.[Fn. 1] Overall The Task Force undertook... Continue Reading →

Can Debtor’s Subchapter V Counsel Be Paid For Services Performed After Removal of Debtor From Possession? (In re Sunergy, In re Pro-Snax, Etc.)

Compensation for late service? (Photo of a famous painting) By: Donald L Swanson Debtor’s Chapter 11 counsel cannot be compensated for services performed after a trustee is appointed and the debtor removed from possession.  That’s the rule of law in the Fifth Circuit and in a not-for-publication decision of the Ninth Circuit’s Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, based... Continue Reading →

Subchapter V Trustee Powers After Debtor’s Removal: Conventional Model v. Impotent Trustee (In re Coeptis Equity)

Unconventional and impotent (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson When a Subchapter V debtor is removed from possession under § 1185(a), what can the Subchapter V trustee do with debtor’s assets and operations? Duties, Rights, Powers and Functions Under § 1184, certain duties of a trustee are delegated to the Subchapter V debtor, “including... Continue Reading →

ABI’s Subchapter V Task Force Recommends Making The $7,500,000 Debt Cap Permanent

By: Donald L Swanson The American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force has issued its “Preliminary Report” on “Maintaining the $7,500,000 Debt Cap for Subchapter V Eligibility.”  This article quotes from and summarizes the Report. Recommendation The Task Force recommends making permanent the $7,500,000 debt cap for Subchapter V eligibility, which is set to expire and... Continue Reading →

2023 Bankruptcy Progress: Developing Subchapter V Law Through Court Opinions

Making progress (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson 2023 has been a good year for developing the law of Subchapter V through court rulings and opinions.  Here are some of the highs and lows of that development. Working as Intended If 2023 shows us anything, it’s this: Subchapter V is working as intended.  Subchapter... Continue Reading →

Rejecting An “Oh, No!” Ruling On Subchapter V Eligibility (In re Zhang)

"Oh, no!" (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Every now and then, a bankruptcy ruling elicits an “Oh, no!” response from just about everyone. And then, subsequent case law starts rejecting and/or chipping-away at that “On, no!” ruling. We have such an “Oh, no!” situation going on right now on a Subchapter V debt-limit... Continue Reading →

Voter Apathy & Consensual v. Non-Consensual Plan Confirmation In Subchapter V (In re Franco’s)

Apathy? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Here’s the latest opinion on a controversial question: In re Franco’s Paving LLC, Case No. 23-20069, Southern Texas Bankruptcy Court, (decided 10/5/2023; Doc. 74). The Question & Answer Voter apathy is a problem in Subchapter V cases.  That apathy is in the form of creditors failing or... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑