
By: Donald L Swanson
Question:
May a Subchapter V trustee utilize the services of a paralegal employed by the trustee’s law firm:
- without a separate application for approval of the paralegal’s employment; and
- with the paralegal’s services being compensated as part of the Subchapter V trustee’s fee application under § 330(a)(1)?
Answer:
The answer appears to be a qualified, “Yes.”
The qualification is that the paralegal’s services, (i) must create actual value and efficiencies in performance of the trustee’s duties, and (ii) must not be used as a mere excuse for recovering overhead or similar costs.
Authorities
Here are two authorities on the subject.
–Handbook for Subchapter V Trustees
The “Handbook” for Subchapter V trustees [Fn. 1] says:
“Case-by-case trustees are compensated through § 330(a)(1)(A) which allows for ‘reasonable compensation for actual, necessary services rendered by the trustee … and by any paraprofessional person employed by any such person’” (at 3-21, emphasis added).
–Bankruptcy Statute
11 U.S.C § 330(a)(1)(A) distinguishes between a paraprofessional employed by the trustee and “a professional person employed under section 327 or 1103.” Here is the operative language (emphasis added):
“(a) (1) . . . the court may award to a trustee, . . . or a professional person employed under section 327 or 1103—(A) reasonable compensation for actual, necessary services rendered by the trustee, . . . professional person, . . . and by any paraprofessional person employed by any such person.”
Such statutory language makes this distinction:
- It requires that a “professional” employed by a trustee file a separate application for employment, and have it approved by the Court, before compensation can even be considered for that professional; but
- It allows for compensation of an in-house “paraprofessional” as part of the trustee’s own services and fee application.
A Caution
The Subchapter V Handbook encourages trustees to “keep in mind . . . Congress’ stated intent that subchapter V cases not be burdened with excessive administrative expenses when planning their work and submitting their fee applications” (at 3-22).
Accordingly, the rule appears to be that:
- services of an in-house paralegal are compensable as part of the Subchapter V trustee’s fee application, when actual efficiencies and value are added by the paralegal; but
- such services must, (i) assist in the trustee’s efforts to satisfy his/her statutory duties, and (ii) be more than an excuse or effort to recover overhead or similar costs.
Conclusion
Services of a Subchapter V trustee’s in-house paralegal are permitted and can be compensated, as part of the Subchapter V trustee’s fee application under 11 U.S.C. § 330; provided the paralegal’s services provide actual efficiencies and value in fulfilling the trustee’s statutory duties.
——————————–
Footnote 1. Handbook for Small Business Chapter 11 Subchapter V Trustees, prepared and published by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Executive Office for United States Trustees (Feb. 2020).
** If you find this article of value, please feel free to share. If you’d like to discuss, let me know.
Leave a Reply