Does Bankruptcy Code Waive Tribal Sovereign Immunity? (Lac Du Flabeau Band v. Coughlin—Oral Arguments At U.S. Supreme Court)

Tribal sovereignty (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Oral arguments occur on April 24, 2023, before the U.S. Supreme Court in Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin, Case No 22-227.  Here is a link to the oral arguments transcript. What follows is an attempt to, (i) summarize the facts... Continue Reading →

Protecting Property Interests From Aggressive Government Tax Taking (Tyler v. Hennepin County—Oral Arguments at U.S. Supreme Court)

Some would call it "theft" (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Oral arguments are held at the U.S. Supreme Court on April 26, 2023, in Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, Case No. 22-166.  A transcript of such arguments is linked here. The essence of the case is this.  Hennepin County, Minnesota: confiscates the home... Continue Reading →

§ 363 Sales And Mootness On Appeal (U.S. Supreme Court)

Mootness? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Everyone knows by now that the U.S. Supreme Court recently declared the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 363(m) to be NOT jurisdictional.[Fn. 1]  Instead, § 363(m) is merely an important statutory directive.[Fn. 2] Mootness Issue What’s received less attention is a preliminary issue the U.S. Supreme Court... Continue Reading →

“Hypothetical Jurisdiction” For A Bankruptcy Appeal? (Waleski v. Montgomery, At U.S. Supreme Court)

Hypothetical? — Chihuly (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L. Swanson Say what?!.  “Hypothetical jurisdiction” for a bankruptcy appeal?!  Who knew?  I sure didn’t. But it is, apparently, a thing . . . and it may even be real. At U.S. Supreme Court A newly filed Petition in the U.S. Supreme Court is Waleski v. Montgomery,... Continue Reading →

How An Honest Debtor’s Discharge Is Denied—A Reversion to Punishment? (Bartenwerfer v. Buckley)

Honest and unfortunate (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The U.S. Supreme Court does not like bankruptcy benefits for individual debtors.  It really doesn’t.  An example from a couple years ago is Fulton v. City of Chicago, where the U.S. Supreme Court finds a way to declare: an impound lot refusing debtor’s demand to... Continue Reading →

First Two Bankruptcy Opinions From The U.S. Supreme Court (Reily v. Lamar & U.S. v. Fisher)?

The first of its kind? (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The U.S. Supreme Court issues its first-ever opinion—of any type—on August 3, 1791. [Fn. 1]  But it does not address a bankruptcy question for quite some time thereafter.  In fact, the first U.S. law on the subject of bankruptcy did not exist until... Continue Reading →

Waiver Of Tribal Sovereign Immunity In Bankruptcy? (At U.S. Supreme Court: Lac du Flambeau Band)

Tribal sovereignty (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson On January 13, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court grants the Petition for a writ of certiorari in Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin, Supreme Court Case No. 22-227, and on January 31, 2023, the Supreme Court enters this order therein: "Set... Continue Reading →

At U.S. Supreme Court: Can A Government Get Away With Cheating A Property Owner In Tax Foreclosure? (Tyler v. Hennepin County)

Some call it theft (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Cruelty prevails, for now, in Hennepin County, Minnesota—with approval from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The case is Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota.[Fn. 1]  Get this.  Hennepin County: confiscates the home of 93-year-old Geraldine Tyler to pay a $15,000 property tax bill; sells... Continue Reading →

When “Projected Disposable Income” Means “Actual Disposable Income”—And How U.S. Supreme Court Disagrees

Projected v. Actual (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The phrase “projected disposable income” is a plan confirmation standard in all reorganization chapters of the Bankruptcy Code for individuals and businesses: Chapter 11—in § 1129(a)(15); Subchapter V—in § 1191(c)(2);          Chapter 12—in § 1225(b)(1); and Chapter 13—in § 1325(b)(1). Inexplicably, three courts (two bankruptcy... Continue Reading →

“Grab What You Can Get, When You Can Get It”: A New Bankruptcy Law Of The Land (Siegel v. U.S. Trustee Program)

Grab what you can get? (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Remember the old saying, “Grab what you can get, when you can get it”? Well . . . that old saying is now the federal law of the land, applying exclusively to bankruptcy laws in Alabama and North Carolina.  Here’s how.  Congress imposed... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: