Mandating Mediation–How It’s Done: (i) Local Rule Examples, and (ii) A Separate Order Guideline

A coffee orchard: here's how it's done By: Donald L. Swanson There are many reasons to mandate mediation in certain circumstances. One is to improve the quality of justice. Another is to manage an expanding docket and burgeoning caseload. A third is to create a mediation culture where none currently exists. There are two ways to... Continue Reading →

How a Judge Makes Mediation Work: Mandatory Mediation

Making it work -- Mandating action (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By Donald L. Swanson Recent expressions of concern about courts mandating mediation reminded me of a mandated mediation process that worked well: the City of Detroit bankruptcy. An illustration of the success of mandated mediation in the Detroit case is this line: The Bankruptcy Judge... Continue Reading →

Mandatory v. Voluntary Mediations: Empirical Data from Pilot Programs

By: Donald L. Swanson We’ve all wondered, over the years, about the advisability and effectiveness of mandatory mediation. Turns out that mandatory and voluntary mediation programs can achieve about the same results when: --judges in a mandatory system accommodate participants who don't want to mediate, and --judges in the voluntary system encourage mediation. Empirical Data... Continue Reading →

Mediation Timing And Details: Adjusting To Unique Circumstances (In re Diocese of Buffalo)

Adjustments to unique circumstances? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By Donald L. Swanson The opinion is from In re The Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y., Case No. 20-10322, Western New York Bankruptcy Court (entered December 27, 2021, Doc. 1487). The Diocese of Buffalo asks the Bankruptcy Court to refer its Chapter 11 case and related adversary proceedings to... Continue Reading →

Mandated Mediation: An Effective Dispute-Resolution Tool

Reprinted with permission from the ABI Journal, Vol. XL, No. 9, September 2021. View the original publication here. By: Donald L Swanson Mandated mediation is authorized by federal statute. As such, 28 U.S.C. § 652(a) provides, “Any district court that elects to require the use of alternative dispute resolution in certain cases may do so only... Continue Reading →

The First-Ever Formal Mediation in Federal Court?

Judge Irving Kaufman By: Donald L. Swanson Judge Irving Kaufman is famous for many things, such as presiding over the Rosenberg espionage trial and rejecting the U.S. government’s attempt to deport John Lennon to the United Kingdom. But Judge Kaufman’s greatest legacy may be for his role in developing mediation as a primary dispute resolution... Continue Reading →

ADR Act of 1998: A Reflection on Its Effectiveness and Shortfalls

By: Donald L Swanson October 31, 2018, was the 20th anniversary of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998 (the “ADR Act”). [Fn. 1] The ADR Act has had a profound impact on the practice of law throughout the federal court system. However, it also has shortfalls that are yet to be rectified. A Mediation Model:... Continue Reading →

When a Case is “Ripe” for Early Mediation

By Donald L. Swanson A 2018 mediation study [Fn. 1] tests the following hypothesis: That referral of a lawsuit to mediation at an early stage is more likely to lead to settlement than a later referral. What the study finds is that timing is a complex issue that’s influenced by and “could be a proxy for”... Continue Reading →

How To Mandate A Voluntary Mediation System That Thrives: A Minnesota Example

By Donald L. Swanson Back in 1994, Minnesota state courts adopt a "mandatory consideration" rule for alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") possibilities. The rule works, back then, like this: Attorneys are required to, (i) consider using ADR in every civil case, (ii) discuss ADR with their client(s) and opposing counsel, and (iii) advise the court of their... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑