By: Donald L. Swanson Here’s a case about the effects of executory contract rejection. While its focus is on “intellectual property” rights under § 365(n) [Fn. 1], the case also delves into the effects of rejection for all types of executory contracts under § 365(g) [Fn. 2]. And this case demonstrates the hazards of a failure... Continue Reading →
Successor Liability After Bankruptcy Sales: Actual Knowledge v. Constructive Notice, at U.S. Supreme Court
By: Donald L. Swanson Imagine buying assets out of bankruptcy at a fair price, only to have a previously-unknown liability tag along. --Surprise, surprise! The U.S. Supreme Court has an opportunity to weigh-in on such a “Surprise, surprise” issue. A petition for writ of certiorari is pending in a case where this could happen—complete with a $63... Continue Reading →
Business Owners Shifting Risks of Failure to Trade Creditors: Solutions are Needed
By Donald L. Swanson “Lending to the most highly indebted companies in the U.S. and Europe is surging.”— Wall Street Journal [Fn. 1] When a large business files for bankruptcy, there is one group that almost always suffers. It is a group with little-to-no power. It is the unsecured trade creditors. It is those that supply... Continue Reading →
Entrepreneurs in Bankruptcy Deserve Respectful Treatment, Not Punishment (In re Romero)
By: Donald L Swanson Many people live the American Dream. They’ve started a business and are succeeding. They’re what makes the U.S. economy work. But bad things can—and do—happen to them: things like product obsolescence, economic downturn, health problems, a costly mistake, bad luck. Such things can destroy their Dream and can destroy the entrepreneurs themselves.... Continue Reading →
Gotta Trust the Mediation Process
By: Donald L. Swanson If there’s anything the history of mediation tells us, it’s this: --We’ve gotta trust the process. Here’s an example, that’s happening right now [in June 2018], of how a failure to trust the mediation process creates issues: In re Las Cruces Country Club, Inc., Case Nos. 16-12947 & 16-12947-j7 (Bankry., D. New... Continue Reading →
Fraudulent Transfers: U.S. Supreme Court Lets an Injustice Stand (Henry v. Weiss)
By: Donald L. Swanson The case is Henry & Buresh v. Weiss (Supreme Court Case No. 17-1210). The U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari on May 29, 2018. This denial allows an injustice to stand, which is a travesty. I’ll try to explain. Facts Michael Bello was sole shareholder, director, and president of Walldesign, Inc. Over a... Continue Reading →
Crime & Punishment & Bankruptcy at U.S. Supreme Court (Lagos v. United States)
By: Donald L. Swanson It’s not every day that the U.S. Supreme Court makes a pronouncement on criminal law in the context of a bankruptcy case. But that’s what happened on Tuesday (May 29, 2018) in the Supreme Court’s Lagos v. United States opinion (Case No. 16-1519). Bankruptcy Facts On February 2, 2010, a trucking enterprise, USA... Continue Reading →
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Arbitration–Again! What’s the Effect on Bankruptcy? (Epic Systems v. Lewis)
By: Donald L. Swanson Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court made its latest pronouncement upholding arbitration: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-285 (issued May 21, 2018). The pronouncement follows a long line of precedents upholding and enforcing arbitration agreements, founded on the Federal Arbitration Act. This article explores the Epic Systems v. Lewis decision... Continue Reading →
Sports Gambling and U.S. Constitution: The Ball is Back in Congress’s Court (Murphy v. NCAA)
By: Donald L. Swanson Football fan: “You just cost me $1,000.” Coach Tom Osborne: “I didn’t make the bet.” Steven M. Sipple, Lincoln Journal Star, May 15, 2018. Question: Can Congress command a state’s lawmakers to outlaw sports gambling? Answer: The U.S. Supreme Court says: "No," Congress has no such authority under the U.S. Constitution; but Congress... Continue Reading →
Clients Want To Be Involved in Settlement Negotiations: An Empirical Study’s Finding
By: Donald L. Swanson Finding from an empirical study: litigants "have great enthusiasm" for participating directly in settlement negotiations and have little enthusiasm for negotiations involving “only the attorneys.” --Prof. Donna Shestowsky in, “Research Report: How Litigants Evaluate Legal Procedures at the Start of their Cases,” 50 Court Review 126 (2014). Common Negotiation Practice I started... Continue Reading →