Bankruptcy: Authority For A Federal Agency’s Constitutional Law? (Jarkesy v. SEC)

Public rights? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) There’s a new U.S. Circuit Court opinion on a person’s right to a jury trial, when sued by the Securities and Exchange Commission before one of its administrative judges. The opinion is Jarkesy v. SEC, case No. 20-61007 (5th Cir., issued May 18, 2022). And guess what:  the most-cited legal authority in... Continue Reading →

What’s Needed For Subchapter V ”Engaged In” Eligibility? Not Much—Not Even A Profit Motive (RS Air)

Engaged in commercial or business activity? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Subchapter V has an “engaged in commercial or business activities” criterion for eligibility. Court opinions applying such criterion appear to be trending in this direction: what’s required is “not much.” A new appellate opinion demonstrating this trend is In re RS AIR, LLC,... Continue Reading →

Middle Market Debtors Who Need Bankruptcy Relief: What To Do? (The “Nebraska Three-Step”)

Three steps? (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson This is reality: Small businesses reorganize, all the time, under Subchapter V;Farmers reorganize, all the time, under Chapter 12; andLarge businesses reorganize, all the time, under regular Chapter 11. That’s because all of those three types of debtors have bankruptcy reorganization processes designed specifically for them.... Continue Reading →

What Does ”Affiliate Of An Issuer” Mean For Subchapter V Ineligibility? (In re Phenomenon)

Affiliates? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson What the heck does this mean: “(1) Debtor.—The term ‘debtor’— . . . (B) does not include— . . . (Iii) any debtor that is an affiliate of an issuer, as defined in section 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c)”    —from Subchapter V’s... Continue Reading →

Trillions Of Dollars In Civil Penalties: “Exhibit A” On Johnson & Johnson’s Need For Bankruptcy

By: Donald L Swanson "Trillions of dollars": That's the amount of civil penalty claims a group of 40 States are asserting against Johnson & Johnson for consumer protection law violations.  [Fn. 1] Such civil penalty claims: are independent of, and in addition to, any claims of individuals who used Johnson & Johnson’s talc products; andarise from... Continue Reading →

Johnson & Johnson: A Bankruptcy Filed In Good Faith

Good faith activity? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Johnson & Johnson and its affiliates (“J&J”) have been selling baby powder for decades. Along the way, studies began showing that talc in J&J’s baby powder can cause ovarian cancer and mesothelioma.  So, since 2016, over 38,000 lawsuits have been filed against J&J contending its... Continue Reading →

Honesty, the Small Cheat, and Reputation

By: Donald L Swanson Business people value their reputations because they take pride in their good names, and “not for some nebulous financial gain.” They: are guided “by their consciences”; and avoid cheating and “keep promises” because they “believe it is right to do so, not because it is good business.” [Fn. 1] The internal drive... Continue Reading →

Precedential Value Of 1885 Supreme Court Opinion On Bankruptcy Discharge Issue? (Bartenwerfer v. Buckly)

Ancient tool with limited present value (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By Donald L. Swanson How much precedential value does an 1885 opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court deserve on a bankruptcy discharge issue? That’s a central question in the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari before the U.S. Supreme Court in Bartenwerfer v. Buckly, Case No.... Continue Reading →

Fruit Of A Rotten Tree: Bankruptcy Administrator Districts And U.S. Trustee Districts (Siegel v. Fitzgerald)

A healthy tree? (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Does a rotten tree produce good fruit?   That’s the bankruptcy issue before the U.S. Supreme Court in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, where the Question is this: “Whether the Bankruptcy Judgeship Act violates the uniformity requirement of the Bankruptcy Clause by increasing quarterly fees solely in... Continue Reading →

Justice Breyer: Fighting To The End (Badgerow v. Walters)

By: Donald L Swanson Justice Stephen G. Breyer is set to retire from the U.S. Supreme Court in a few months. But he’s not easing into retirement.  Instead, he’s out there swinging—fighting for his beliefs: trying to instruct / persuade current and future jurists on how the law should be applied. Justice Breyer’s latest punch is... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑