Subchapter V Trustee Powers After Debtor’s Removal: Conventional Model v. Impotent Trustee (In re Coeptis Equity)

Unconventional and impotent (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson When a Subchapter V debtor is removed from possession under § 1185(a), what can the Subchapter V trustee do with debtor’s assets and operations? Duties, Rights, Powers and Functions Under § 1184, certain duties of a trustee are delegated to the Subchapter V debtor, “including... Continue Reading →

“Bankruptcy Is Bad” = A Faulty Assumption For Mass Tort Cases (3M Combat Arms Earplugs Settlement)

A bad development (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The existence of a bankruptcy option is a good thing for any debtor-creditor situation that is highly stressed—whether the bankruptcy option is used or not.  This is especially true in mass-tort cases where a potential exists for (i) hugely-disparate results for similarly situated plaintiffs, and... Continue Reading →

A Rough Day At U.S. Supreme Court, During Oral Arguments, For Debtor’s Counsel (Truck Insurance v. Kaiser Gypsum)

A rough day (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson A mass-tort asbestos case before the U.S. Supreme Court is Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., Case No 22-1079.  Here is a link to the transcript of oral arguments in that case, from March 19, 2024. In Truck Insurance, the question is whether... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy Abuse Rarely Works . . . Because Of Gatekeepers—APPELLATE COURTS (Part 5)

An appellate gatekeeper? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Over the years, I’ve heard lots of people say, “Bankruptcy abuse is a huge problem,” as a self-evident and undeniable proposition.  But here’s the thing.  Debtors who try to abuse the bankruptcy system rarely get away with it.  That’s because there are too many gatekeepers—and... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy Abuse Rarely Works . . . Because Of Gatekeepers—BANKRUPTCY COURTS (Part 4)

Bankruptcy judge as gatekeeper? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Over the years, I’ve heard lots of people say, “Bankruptcy abuse is a huge problem,” as a self-evident and undeniable proposition.  But here’s the thing.  Debtors who try to abuse the bankruptcy system rarely get away with it.  That’s because there are too many... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy Abuse Rarely Works . . . Because Of Gatekeepers—U.S. TRUSTEES (Part 3)

U.S. Trustee as gatekeeper? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Over the years, I’ve heard lots of people say, “Bankruptcy abuse is a huge problem,” as a self-evident and undeniable proposition.  But here’s the thing.  Debtors who try to abuse the bankruptcy system rarely get away with it.  That’s because there are too many... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy Abuse Rarely Works . . . Because Of Gatekeepers—CREDITORS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS (Part 2)

Creditors as gatekeeper? (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Over the years, I’ve heard lots of people say, “Bankruptcy abuse is a huge problem,” as a self-evident and undeniable proposition.  But here’s the thing.  Debtors who try to abuse the bankruptcy system rarely get away with it.  That’s because there are too many gatekeepers—and... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy Abuse Rarely Works . . . Because Of Gatekeepers—DEBTOR’S ATTORNEY (Part 1)

Debtor's attorney as gatekeeper? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Over the years, I’ve heard lots of people say, “Bankruptcy abuse is a huge problem,” as a self-evident and undeniable proposition.  But here’s the thing.  Debtors who try to abuse the bankruptcy system rarely get away with it. That’s because there are too many... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy Abuse Rarely Works . . . Because Of Gatekeepers—INTRODUCTION

Abuse? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson I recently heard politicians on all sides of the political divide agree on one thing as self-evident: that bankruptcy abuse by “fabulously wealthy corporations” is rampant; and Johnson & Johnson is a prime example of that abuse.  Those partisans also agree on this point (again, as self-evident):... Continue Reading →

ABI’s Subchapter V Task Force Recommends Making The $7,500,000 Debt Cap Permanent

By: Donald L Swanson The American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force has issued its “Preliminary Report” on “Maintaining the $7,500,000 Debt Cap for Subchapter V Eligibility.”  This article quotes from and summarizes the Report. Recommendation The Task Force recommends making permanent the $7,500,000 debt cap for Subchapter V eligibility, which is set to expire and... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑