Disputed property line is on the west side of this photo By Donald L. Swanson The opinion is In re Mattox, Case No. 18-10101-13 in the Kansas Bankruptcy Court, decided October 19, 2020 (Doc. 93). Homestead Exemption Dispute Here’s what happened. Debtor files Chapter 7 bankruptcy, claiming a homestead exemption in 43 acres of property, having... Continue Reading →

Are they ripe? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The timing of mediation efforts in litigation is important (and can be tricky).  Studies show that early is better than late.  But in early mediation efforts, a tension exists between, (i) acting promptly, and (ii) assuring that parties have adequate information to make informed decisions.... Continue Reading →

Theory (i.e., mediator neutrality and party self-determination) gives way to the practical need for achieving a settlement.

By: Donald L. Swanson “’Early’ (mediation) is good and usually best”; but “Lawyers are not easily persuaded away from the view that they ‘need more info’ before they engage settlement discussions in mediation”; and “in many cases, they may be right.” --Comment by a mediation professional on a discussion board. I agree with this comment—100%—for regular... Continue Reading →

Waiting a tad-too-long? By: Donald L. Swanson It happens in the Chapter 11 case of In re C2R Global Manufacturing, Inc., (Case No. 18-30182 in Eastern Wisconsin Bankruptcy Court): the judge must rule before the parties will settle. That may seem a tad-too-late. But it happens, and In re C2R is Exhibit A. Disputes C2R Global... Continue Reading →

By: Donald L. Swanson “Joint Session <———> Caucus Only” "Fact Disputes <———> Law Disputes"  A continuum? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) These are two sets of mediation continuums. Here’s a theory I've heard on how the “joint session” to “caucus only” continuum and the "fact disputes" to "law disputes" continuum overlap in commercial cases.  I'd like to... Continue Reading →

By: Donald L Swanson “All your assumptions on this are wrong.” --A visionary, back in 1999, on why video communications will work. Change It was nearly a decade ago, when I suggested participating in a mandated and far-away mediation by Skype. The Judge said, “No, because face-to-face communication is essential to mediation.” It was nearly a... Continue Reading →

The Uschold v NSMG opinion provides another illustration of the post-settlement work that mediation can accomplish when a court must weigh-in on the merits of a mediated agreement.

Mediation must adapt now and embrace the distancing.