When hazards happen (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson “Puffing” is famously—or notoriously—known as acceptable negotiating behavior in these United States. “Puffing” means something akin to “fibbing”: taking exaggerated positions, pursuing hidden agendas, hiding the ball on willingness to bend, etc. Although “puffing” in negotiations may be acceptable behavior, it is, often, not a... Continue Reading →
Study: Effectiveness Of Deadlines For Responding To Offers
An expired deadline? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Every party in a mediation or other negotiation effort puzzles over time limits for responding to offers. Questions that offering parties often grapple with include: How long should the time limit be for responding?Should the time-limited offer be presented as a step in the negotiating... Continue Reading →
ABI’s Mediation Committee: A Home For The “Facilitate” Role Of Subchapter V Trustees
https://youtu.be/0kEXfRwXDSg By: Donald L Swanson The Mediation Committee of the American Bankruptcy Institute promotes mediation as a tool for resolving bankruptcy disputes. The new statutory duty of a Subchapter V trustee to “facilitate the development of a consensual plan of reorganization” (under § 1183(b)(7)) is a mediator-like role, which finds a home in ABI’s Mediation Committee.... Continue Reading →
Observations on the Survey of Facilitation by Subchapter V Trustees
11 U.S.C. Sec. 1183(b)(7) — Duty to facilitate The following article is reprinted with permission from the American Bankruptcy Institute—originally published in its Mediation Committee Newsletter. Here is a link to the original publication, dated 6/30/2021. By: Hon. Louis H. Kornreich, David A. Mawhinney & Donald L Swanson The Bankruptcy Code directs the trustee in... Continue Reading →
Facilitation Skills For Subchapter V Trustees
Webinar -- Promotional Notification By: Donald L Swanson What follows is a script (more or less) of my portion of a panel presentation in an webinar, presented on September 14, 2021, sponsored by the Mediation Committee of the American Bankruptcy Institute ("ABI"), titled "Facilitation Skills for Subchapter V Trustees." A video of the webinar appears at... Continue Reading →
The Four “C’s” of Mediation: Candor, Cooperation, Creativity and Courage (from Judge Rosen)
Bankruptcy Petition for City of Detroit By: Donald L Swanson Judge Gerald Rosen [fn. 1] served as Chief Judicial Mediator in the City of Detroit bankruptcy. He is credited with masterminding an $820 million deal that rescued the City of Detroit from bankruptcy. In a fascinating discussion, Judge Rosen recently explained and illustrated his Four "C’s”... Continue Reading →
Litigious People Are Going to Litigate—And Mediation Can’t Change That Fact (In re Butko)
Stubborn persistence (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The opinion is In re Butko, Case No. 20-21255 in the Western Pennsylvania Bankruptcy Court (decided 2/10/2021, Doc. 91). Litigious Parties The parties have been at it for awhile. You know the history is bad, when a Court opinion begins its “Background” explanation like this: “In... Continue Reading →
Subchapter V Trustee As “De Facto Mediator” (In re 218 Jackson)
De facto end of the harbor? (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson A Subchapter V trustee “acts more like a mediator than an adversary”; and A “substantial part of the Subchapter V trustee’s pre-confirmation role” is to “serve as a de facto mediator between the debtor and its creditors.” --From In re 218 Jackson... Continue Reading →
Perils Of Mediating / Settling With Less Than All Defendants (Kennedy v. Alliance)
Include them all? (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Settling with less than all defendants in a lawsuit is always tricky. And mediating without all interested parties involved is also tricky. The problem is that non-settling / non-participating parties might, (i) blow a settlement up, once they learn of it, (ii) be released unintentionally... Continue Reading →
Zoom Mediations And “Trust”: A Study
Trusting? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson A 2019 study [Fn. 1] examines whether mediating parties will trust a mediator when the mediation occurs over Zoom (or similar platform), instead of in-person. Here are the study’s conclusions: all fifty-nine study participants "felt that they could trust the mediator and perceived the mediator as trustworthy”—whether... Continue Reading →