Compensating Mediators: Procedural Guidance From Sears v. Lampert

Procedural guidance? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By Donald L. Swanson How are private practice mediators compensated in a bankruptcy case—procedurally? We have a new court order providing guidance on how such procedures can work. The new guidance is from Sears Holding Corp. v. Lampert (In re Sears Holdings Corp.), Adv. Pro. No. 19-08250, SDNY Bankruptcy Court. ... Continue Reading →

Subchapter V Trustees: Satisfying The § 1183(b)(3) Duty To “Appear And Be Heard”

Appearing and being heard? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson "The trustee shall . . . appear and be heard at . . . any hearing that concerns . . . the value of property . . . confirmation of a plan . . . sale of property." § 1183(b)(3) (emphasis added). In every... Continue Reading →

Honesty, the Small Cheat, and Reputation

By: Donald L Swanson Business people value their reputations because they take pride in their good names, and “not for some nebulous financial gain.” They: are guided “by their consciences”; and avoid cheating and “keep promises” because they “believe it is right to do so, not because it is good business.” [Fn. 1] The internal drive... Continue Reading →

Precedential Value Of 1885 Supreme Court Opinion On Bankruptcy Discharge Issue? (Bartenwerfer v. Buckly)

Ancient tool with limited present value (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By Donald L. Swanson How much precedential value does an 1885 opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court deserve on a bankruptcy discharge issue? That’s a central question in the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari before the U.S. Supreme Court in Bartenwerfer v. Buckly, Case No.... Continue Reading →

Mediators: Reject A Binary Equation — “Either This Or That” (In re City of Detroit)

“Either this or that” (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By Donald L. Swanson Here’s an important rule for mediators: When the parties try to present you with a binary equation—“either this or that”—reject it; insteadGet the parties involved in the process with you—try to help think your way out of the binary box they are trying to... Continue Reading →

Fruit Of A Rotten Tree: Bankruptcy Administrator Districts And U.S. Trustee Districts (Siegel v. Fitzgerald)

A healthy tree? (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Does a rotten tree produce good fruit?   That’s the bankruptcy issue before the U.S. Supreme Court in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, where the Question is this: “Whether the Bankruptcy Judgeship Act violates the uniformity requirement of the Bankruptcy Clause by increasing quarterly fees solely in... Continue Reading →

Justice Breyer: Fighting To The End (Badgerow v. Walters)

By: Donald L Swanson Justice Stephen G. Breyer is set to retire from the U.S. Supreme Court in a few months. But he’s not easing into retirement.  Instead, he’s out there swinging—fighting for his beliefs: trying to instruct / persuade current and future jurists on how the law should be applied. Justice Breyer’s latest punch is... Continue Reading →

Allowing Attorney Fee Applications, Or Not, in Bankruptcy (In re H.T.O. & In re Sylvester)

An well-worn path (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Question: What gets an attorney’s fee application allowed—or rejected—in bankruptcy?  Short answer: The services, (i) must be “necessary,” and (ii) must require legal expertise. Two Recent Opinions Two recent opinions address this question: In re H.T.O. Architect, PLLC, Case No. 19-10915, SDNY Bankruptcy Court (issued... Continue Reading →

Uniform Law Commission: New Study Committee On Assignments For Benefit Of Creditors

Dale G. Higer is an attorney and a long-time Commissioner for the State of Idaho on the Uniform Law Commission.  His newest role is Chair of the Commission’s newly-formed Study Committee on Assignments for Benefit of Creditors. What follows is Mr. Higer’s report on the Commission and on the work of the newly formed Study... Continue Reading →

Subchapter V Plan: Why Extend The Deadline And Slow The Case?!

Built for speed (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By Donald L. Swanson “Subchapter V is supposed to be a fast process toward plan confirmation, but I don’t see that happening!” --Comment of a Bankruptcy Judge (as I recall the comment) It’s true: (i) Subchapter V is supposed to go quickly, but (ii) it often doesn’t. Here’s why... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑