Expired (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The continuing effort in Congress to extend Subchapter V’s $7.5 million debt limit recently hit a snag. The result: the $7.5 million debt limit for Subchapter V eligibility expired on June 21, 2024, and the Subchapter V debt limit is now reduced to an inflation-adjusted $3,024,725.[i] The... Continue Reading →
“Texas Two Step”: More Than A Legal Expletive? (Esserman v. Bestwall)
Uttering an expletive? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The phrase “Texas Two-Step,” as used in bankruptcy, is a legal expletive. Regardless of what the details of a Texas Two-Step might be, the phrase has become synonymous with: abusive behavior; bad faith conduct; a means for swindling creditors; the antithesis of “doing what’s right”;... Continue Reading →
A Bankruptcy / Mass Tort Dilemma For Congress To Solve (Johnson & Johnson v. Purdue Pharma)
By: Donald L Swanson Here’s a dilemma: Should bankruptcy be available as a tool for resolving mass tort cases of all types (like it already is in asbestos contexts)? Here’s an illustration of the dilemma: many tort claimants in the Johnson & Johnson case DO NOT want bankruptcy involved; but many tort claimants in the Purdue... Continue Reading →
History & Progress of Subchapter V (Interview With Judge Harner)
https://youtu.be/pjbJU1cUf80 By: Donald L Swanson Hon. Michelle M. Harner is Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Maryland. Judge Harner has a long history of work on creating and implementing Subchapter V bankruptcy laws for smaller businesses. That history includes these two roles: back in 2012 through 2014, Judge Harner served as Reporter for the Commission to... Continue Reading →
What The U.S. Supreme Court Did NOT Decide: “The Outer Bounds Of § 1109(b)” (Truck Insurance)
A narrow view (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion is Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., Case No. 22-1079, Decided June 6, 2024. Opinion’s Q & A The Truck Insurance question is this: Whether an insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is a “party in... Continue Reading →
Sub V Task Force Report In A Nutshell: Part 8—Plan Filing After Debtor’s Removal
By: Donald L Swanson On April 23, 2024, the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force issued its Final Report. This article is the eighth in a series summarizing and condensing the Task Force’s Final Report into “a nutshell.” The subject of this article is: whether the Subchapter V trustee or other party in interest should... Continue Reading →
Conflicting Statutes: ERISA Arbitration & Bankruptcy Claims Allowance (In re Yellow Corp.)
Conflict (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson We have a direct statutory conflict: one statute requires an ERISA dispute to be resolved in arbitration; but a bankruptcy statute requires the same dispute to be resolved in bankruptcy. Which statute should prevail? The bankruptcy statute, of course. That’s the conclusion of In re Yellow Corp.[Fn.... Continue Reading →
Sub V Task Force Report In A Nutshell: Part 7—$7,500,000 Debt Cap
By: Donald L Swanson On April 23, 2024, the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force issued its Final Report. This article is the seventh in a series summarizing and condensing the Task Force’s Final Report into “a nutshell.” The subject of this article is: whether the $7,500,000 debt cap for Subchapter V eligibility should remain... Continue Reading →
Can IRS Be Sued For A Fraudulent Transfer Under § 544(b)? (U.S. V. Miller)
By: Donald L Swanson Before the U.S. Supreme Court on a Petition for writ of certiorari is United States v. Miller, Case No. 23-824 (“Distributed for Conference of 6/13/2024”). In United States v. Miller, a Chapter 7 Trustee obtains a fraudulent transfer judgment under 11 U.S.C. § 544(b) against the Internal Revenue Service to recover two... Continue Reading →
Sub V Task Force Report In A Nutshell: Part 6—Subchapter V Trustee As Mediator?
By: Donald L Swanson On April 23, 2024, the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force issued its Final Report. This article is the sixth in a series summarizing and condensing the Task Force’s Final Report into “a nutshell.” The subject of this article is: whether a Subchapter V trustee should act as a mediator.[Fn. 1]... Continue Reading →