Applying “Intent” Standard For Denying A Discharge Under § 727(a)(2) (Wylie v. Miller)

What’s the intent? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2), an individual debtor may be denied a discharge, in its entirely, for making a transfer “with intent to hinder, delay, or defraud” a creditor or the trustee. On April 17, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Michigan ruled: an “intent... Continue Reading →

The “Silent” Creditor Problem In Subchapter V (In re M.V.J. Auto)

A "Silent" Participant? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson A “silent” creditor in Subchapter V is one who does not vote on the debtor’s plan and does not object to that plan.  The “silent” creditor is a problem for Subchapter V cases. The Problem Here’s the problem: Subchapter V plans are prevented from being... Continue Reading →

Individual Debtor Discharge v. Corporate Debtor Discharge

Alive? Or a fiction? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Here are a couple discharge-related bankruptcy questions I’ve heard of late, along with an answer. Question 1.  Why are individuals, but not corporations, eligible for a Chapter 7 discharge? §727(a)(1) says, “the court shall grant the debtor a discharge, unless—(1) the debtor is not... Continue Reading →

Non-Compete And Confidentiality Provisions Cannot Be Discharged—Even When The Contract Is Rejected (In re Empower)

Confidential and no competition (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Can non-compete and confidentiality protections in a rejected franchise agreement be discharged in bankruptcy? The answer is, “No,” according to In re Empower Central Michigan, Inc.[Fn. 1] Facts Debtor is an automotive repair shop.  Debtor operates under a Franchise Agreement with Autolab Franchising, LLC. ... Continue Reading →

Subchapter V’s $7.5 Million Debt Limit Expired: A Return To Congress’s Bias Against Formerly-Successful Entrepreneurs?

Expired (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The continuing effort in Congress to extend Subchapter V’s $7.5 million debt limit recently hit a snag.  The result: the $7.5 million debt limit for Subchapter V eligibility expired on June 21, 2024, and the Subchapter V debt limit is now reduced to an inflation-adjusted $3,024,725.[i] The... Continue Reading →

“Texas Two Step”: More Than A Legal Expletive? (Esserman v. Bestwall)

Uttering an expletive? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The phrase “Texas Two-Step,” as used in bankruptcy, is a legal expletive.  Regardless of what the details of a Texas Two-Step might be, the phrase has become synonymous with: abusive behavior; bad faith conduct; a means for swindling creditors; the antithesis of “doing what’s right”;... Continue Reading →

A Bankruptcy / Mass Tort Dilemma For Congress To Solve (Johnson & Johnson v. Purdue Pharma)

By: Donald L Swanson Here’s a dilemma: Should bankruptcy be available as a tool for resolving mass tort cases of all types (like it already is in asbestos contexts)? Here’s an illustration of the dilemma: many tort claimants in the Johnson & Johnson case DO NOT want bankruptcy involved; but many tort claimants in the Purdue... Continue Reading →

History & Progress of Subchapter V (Interview With Judge Harner)

https://youtu.be/pjbJU1cUf80 By: Donald L Swanson Hon. Michelle M. Harner is Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Maryland. Judge Harner has a long history of work on creating and implementing Subchapter V bankruptcy laws for smaller businesses.  That history includes these two roles: back in 2012 through 2014, Judge Harner served as Reporter for the Commission to... Continue Reading →

What The U.S. Supreme Court Did NOT Decide: “The Outer Bounds Of § 1109(b)” (Truck Insurance)

A narrow view (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion is Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc., Case No. 22-1079, Decided June 6, 2024. Opinion’s Q & A The Truck Insurance question is this: Whether an insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is a “party in... Continue Reading →

Sub V Task Force Report In A Nutshell: Part 8—Plan Filing After Debtor’s Removal

By: Donald L Swanson On April 23, 2024, the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force issued its Final Report. This article is the eighth in a series summarizing and condensing the Task Force’s Final Report into “a nutshell.”  The subject of this article is: whether the Subchapter V trustee or other party in interest should... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑