Dissenting Opinions At U.S. Supreme Court (Coinbase v. Bielski & Waleski v. Montgomery)

Dissenters? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Dissenting opinions are always interesting.  Sometimes, they are even the most interesting part of the entire case. Two recent dissents, in opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court, are decided three days apart: on June 23 & 26 of 2023, respectively. The first opinion has a four-Justices dissent... Continue Reading →

Guidance From Justices Gorsuch and Jackson on “Excessive Fines” Under U.S. Constitution (Tyler v. Hennepin County)

Eighth Amendment to U.S. Constitution By: Donald L Swanson “we need not decide whether she has also alleged an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment.” --From U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion, Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, Case No. 22-166, at 14 (decided May 25, 2023). By now, everyone knows that the U.S. Supreme Court, in Tyler... Continue Reading →

Sovereign Immunity In Bankruptcy: Contrasting Opinions From U.S. Supreme Court (Puerto Rico & Lac Du Flabeau Tribe)

Tribal sovereignty (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Contrasting opinions from any court, issued a month apart, are always instructive.  And we have a new such thing—from the U.S. Supreme Court, no less, and from May and June of this year. The contrast is on this subject: whether sovereign immunities of Puerto Rico and... Continue Reading →

Who Is A “Party in Interest”: Broad v. Narrow Construction (Truck v. Kaiser at U.S. Supreme Court)

Narrow (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson When a federal court approves a [bankruptcy] plan allowing someone to put its hands into another person’s pockets, the person with the pockets is entitled to be fully heard and to have legitimate objections addressed.[Fn. 1] Pop Quiz Question: Does Insurer, in the following facts, have standing... Continue Reading →

Does Bankruptcy Code Waive Tribal Sovereign Immunity? (Lac Du Flabeau Band v. Coughlin—Oral Arguments At U.S. Supreme Court)

Tribal sovereignty (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Oral arguments occur on April 24, 2023, before the U.S. Supreme Court in Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Coughlin, Case No 22-227.  Here is a link to the oral arguments transcript. What follows is an attempt to, (i) summarize the facts... Continue Reading →

Protecting Property Interests From Aggressive Government Tax Taking (Tyler v. Hennepin County—Oral Arguments at U.S. Supreme Court)

Some would call it "theft" (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Oral arguments are held at the U.S. Supreme Court on April 26, 2023, in Tyler v. Hennepin County, Minnesota, Case No. 22-166.  A transcript of such arguments is linked here. The essence of the case is this.  Hennepin County, Minnesota: confiscates the home... Continue Reading →

§ 363 Sales And Mootness On Appeal (U.S. Supreme Court)

Mootness? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Everyone knows by now that the U.S. Supreme Court recently declared the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 363(m) to be NOT jurisdictional.[Fn. 1]  Instead, § 363(m) is merely an important statutory directive.[Fn. 2] Mootness Issue What’s received less attention is a preliminary issue the U.S. Supreme Court... Continue Reading →

“Hypothetical Jurisdiction” For A Bankruptcy Appeal? (Waleski v. Montgomery, At U.S. Supreme Court)

Hypothetical? — Chihuly (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L. Swanson Say what?!.  “Hypothetical jurisdiction” for a bankruptcy appeal?!  Who knew?  I sure didn’t. But it is, apparently, a thing . . . and it may even be real. At U.S. Supreme Court A newly filed Petition in the U.S. Supreme Court is Waleski v. Montgomery,... Continue Reading →

How An Honest Debtor’s Discharge Is Denied—A Reversion to Punishment? (Bartenwerfer v. Buckley)

Honest and unfortunate (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The U.S. Supreme Court does not like bankruptcy benefits for individual debtors.  It really doesn’t.  An example from a couple years ago is Fulton v. City of Chicago, where the U.S. Supreme Court finds a way to declare: an impound lot refusing debtor’s demand to... Continue Reading →

First Two Bankruptcy Opinions From The U.S. Supreme Court (Reily v. Lamar & U.S. v. Fisher)?

The first of its kind? (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The U.S. Supreme Court issues its first-ever opinion—of any type—on August 3, 1791. [Fn. 1]  But it does not address a bankruptcy question for quite some time thereafter.  In fact, the first U.S. law on the subject of bankruptcy did not exist until... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑