Nobody Likes Bankruptcy: That’s A Problem Among Generalist Appellate Jurists

Old overruling new? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson “[T]he Supreme Court’s decisions evince a general skepticism about broad application of the Bankruptcy Code, which often has led to surprisingly narrow interpretations of relatively clear language,” which “challenges the common understanding of bankruptcy law as a domain of the Court’s plain-language interpretative practice.” [Fn.... Continue Reading →

Our Mass Tort System Is Broken: As Illustrated By Delays And Costs (Boy Scouts)

Broken -- Exhibit by Nathan Sawaya (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson I’ve been saying this for a long time: the mass tort system of justice in these United States is broken. Two piece of brokenness (there are lots of pieces) are: agonizingly long delays and excessive costs.  We now have a new illustration... Continue Reading →

Here We Go Again: U.S. Supreme Court Invites Solicitor General’s Views On A Bankruptcy Case In Which U.S. Is Not A Party (Hertz v. Wells Fargo)

By: Donald L Swanson “Jun 02 2025    The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.” That’s the latest entry by the U.S. Supreme Court on its electronic docket for Case No. 24-1062, The Hertz Corporation, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee.... Continue Reading →

“Writing” Attachment Requirements For A Proof Of Claim And Prima Facie Validity (In re SVB)

A refreshing scene (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Here is a refresher on the proof of claim requirement for a "writing" attachment (under Fed.R.Bankr.P. 3001), and on the prima facie validity that can result (under subpart (f) thereof). The opinion is In re SVB Financial Group, Case No. 23-10367 in SDNY Bankruptcy Court... Continue Reading →

In Bankruptcy Sales, Value Maximization Preempts Technicality Enforcement (In re Parkcliffe)

The greater good? (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson What happens when a bankruptcy sale is nearly complete . . . and someone presents a substantially-higher bid? Must the lower-price deal proceed to completion? Or can the higher bid be considered? The answer is this: maximizing value is the greater good, so the higher... Continue Reading →

What Qualifies As “Consent” For A Third Party Release? (In re Spirit Airlines)

Consent? (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson In Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 603 U.S. 204 (2024), the Supreme Court declares: the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize non-consensual third-party releases in Chapter 11 plans of reorganization; but “Nothing in what we have said should be construed to call into question consensual third-party releases offered... Continue Reading →

Congress Codified The Ninth Circuit’s New Value Exception/Corollary To The Absolute Priority Rule For Individual Debtors: In BAPCPA?

BAPCPA By Donald L. Swanson The text of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”) is linked here. Title III of BAPCPA is named “Discouraging Bankruptcy Abuse,” and § 321 (from said Title III) is named “Chapter 11 Cases Filed by Individuals.”  Such § 321 makes the following changes to the Bankruptcy... Continue Reading →

“Vesting” Property In Debtor At Plan Confirmation: What Does It Mean? (In re Marsh)

Wearing a vest (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By Donald L. Swanson This statutory language appears in each of Chapter 13, Chapter 12 and Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code: “Property of the estate includes . . . all property . . . that the debtor acquires after the commencement of the case”; and “confirmation of a... Continue Reading →

A History Of The Bankruptcy Discharge: From Debtor’s Prison To Uniformity (Central Virginia v. Katz)

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Today, the sole function a bankruptcy discharge is to rid the debtor of debts and, thereby, provide a fresh financial start. But in the 1700s, the focus was on getting a debtor’s body discharged from debtor’s prison, to provide a fresh start through personal liberty. And... Continue Reading →

A Not-For-Profit Is Eligible For Subchapter V (Guan v. Ellingsworth)

“commercial or business activities”? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson “We now hold that a not-for-profit company can be ‘engaged in commercial or business activities’ as that phrase is used" in Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code. Guan v. Ellingsworth Residential Community Association, Inc., 125 F.4th 1365 (11th Cir. 2025). Guan is a homeowner... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑