Mandated Mediation: Authorized By Federal Statute

By: Donald L Swanson “Any district court that elects to require the use of alternative dispute resolution . . . may do so only with respect to mediation, . . . “         --From 28 U.S.C. § 652(a)—Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998. The correct view on a Federal court's authority to mandate... Continue Reading →

How To Mandate A Voluntary Mediation System That Thrives: A Minnesota Example

By Donald L. Swanson Back in 1994, Minnesota state courts adopt a "mandatory consideration" rule for alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") possibilities. The rule works, back then, like this: Attorneys are required to, (i) consider using ADR in every civil case, (ii) discuss ADR with their client(s) and opposing counsel, and (iii) advise the court of their... Continue Reading →

Mediation in New Zealand — A Study on How It’s Done

By: Donald L. Swanson Sometimes it’s helpful, in understanding our own situation, to look at someone else’s. Mediation is a common tool for resolving commercial disputes in New Zealand.  A 2017 study of mediation in New Zealand reveals how it's done there: “From Anecdote to Evidence: The New Zealand Commercial Mediation Market [Fn. 1]. General Findings... Continue Reading →

Are Emotional Arguments Helpful or Harmful in Mediating Commercial Disputes?

By: Donald L Swanson Settlement = Assessment of Risks + Math I made up this unsophisticated formula decades ago to explain what happens when a negotiated settlement occurs in a commercial dispute. What I’ve found, since then, is that the formula holds true in the vast majority of cases—even when emotions and tempers are on edge.... Continue Reading →

Caucus Inadequacy and the Joint Session Solution for Multi-Party Mediations

  By: Donald L Swanson Let’s say that a mediation among four parties or more is a “multi-party” mediation. Caucus Inadequacy Here’s how a caucus format works—inadequately—in a mediation among four parties: the mediation starts at 9:00 a.m. with a half-hour joint session to set the rules and format, whereupon, the parties split into sequestered conference... Continue Reading →

Mediation — And the Role of the Small Business Trustee

By: Donald L Swanson “Those with business, managerial, consulting, mediation and operational experience are encouraged to apply.” --From “Solicitation” by U.S. Trustee for Applicants to Serve as Subchapter V Trustees (emphasis added) Back in August of this year, the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 became law. It’s effective date is 180 days later—February 19, 2020.... Continue Reading →

Empirical Studies and the Mediator’s Proposal — A Portal to Decision

By: Donald L. Swanson Let’s try combining a couple empirical studies on unrelated matters to support the following proposition: --The “mediator’s proposal,” as a form of choice delegation, can help parties reach settlement.  The proposal becomes a portal or entryway to decision. First Study: Delegating Difficult Choices The first study is titled, “Delegating Decisions: Recruiting Others... Continue Reading →

When Impasse on a Legal Issue Impedes Mediation: An Example of Effective Action

By: Donald L Swanson There is often a tension in mediation that goes something like this: Party of the first part says: We win on a technical legal issue—100% certainty! Party of the second part responds: You do not win on that issue—100% certainty! Party of the first part reacts: Do so! Party of the second... Continue Reading →

The Problem of Caucus in Mediating Business Disputes

By: Donald L Swanson “The Mediator is a nice guy, but he needed to pound harder on the other side.” —A disappointed litigator on why a mediation did not achieve settlement. This quote is a common post-mediation refrain. A Fundamental Error The quote contains a fundamental error. The error is this assumption: it is the mediator’s... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: