Northern Pipeline v. Marathon And Stern v. Marshall: Bankruptcy Law Run Amok (Part 3)

Northern Pipeline & Stern Opinions By: Donald L Swanson The U.S. Supreme Court has never liked like the Bankruptcy Code and has worked diligently, over the decades, to limit the authority of bankruptcy courts and bankruptcy judges.  Two examples are U.S. Supreme Court opinions that have anniversaries this month—in June of 2026: 44 years ago (on... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy Court Authority & “Stuff . . . Tried By The Courts At Westminster In 1789” (Part 2)

Northern Pipeline & Stern Opinions By: Donald L Swanson Here is a common statement of bankruptcy court jurisdiction: “The Court has constitutional authority to determine this matter because it,” “is purely a matter of bankruptcy law”; and “does not require the resolution of any matter similar to ‘the stuff of the traditional actions at common law... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy Court Authority And “Personal Injury Tort” Claims? (Arrieta v. Smith)

A place of authority? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(5) provides: “personal injury tort and wrongful death claims shall be tried in the district court in which the bankruptcy case is pending, or in the district court in the district in which the claim arose” In other words, “personal injury... Continue Reading →

Equitable Tolling & Due Process For Dischargeability Deadlines (TL90108 v. Ford)

A place of equity? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The opinion is TL90108 LLC v. Ford, Case No. 21-10456 (11th Cir., decided August 11, 2025). Facts A rare vehicle is stolen from the owner’s Milwaukee garage and shipped to Europe in 2001.  The owner dies in 2005 while the vehicle is missing. An... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy Court Has Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over An Improperly Filed Petition—But Must Dismiss (In re Whittaker–Part 2)

By: Donald L Swanson Even though a bankruptcy petition is improperly filed, the bankruptcy court still has subject matter jurisdiction over the case—but must dismiss it. That’s what the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals declares in In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc., Case Nos. 24-2210 & 24-2211 (3rd Cir., decided September 10, 2025).## What... Continue Reading →

Do Federal Courts Have Bankruptcy Jurisdiction Over Solvent Debtors? (Bestwall v. Committee)

Jurisdiction? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson The question addressed by the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in its Bestwell v. Official Committee opinion[fn. 1] is this (emphasis added): Do federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over bankruptcy cases involving solvent debtors? Its answer is: “Yes.” Some History I started practicing law in... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy Courts Resolving Tax Disputes Under § 505—What Are The Limits? (Bush v. U.S.; Etc.)

Testing the limits? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson What are the limits of a bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction and authority to resolve tax disputes under § 505?[Fn. 1] That’s the issue before the U.S. Supreme Court in a Petition filed on July 25, 2025, in Bush v. United States of America, Case No. 25-108.... Continue Reading →

Can “Void” Judgment Become Valid By Passage Of Time? (Certiorari Granted on 6/6/2025)

Coming out of the void? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Can a judgment that’s “void” for lack of jurisdiction become valid by the passage of time? That’s the question on which the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari (on June 6, 2025—in Case No. 24-808, Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton, Chapter... Continue Reading →

Equitable Mootness Rejected & A Confirmed Plan Provision Excised (In re Serta)

A portion excised? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Equitable mootness does not prevent the excising (i.e., the surgical removal), on appeal, of an indemnification provision from a confirmed Plan.    That’s the ruling of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Excluded Lenders v. Serta Simmons Bedding, L.L.C. (In re Serta Simmons... Continue Reading →

Chapter 7 Debtor’s Appellate Standing To Protect The Homestead Exemption? (In re Karamoussayan)

A homestead (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Does a Chapter 7 debtor have appellate standing to protect the homestead exemption? That’s an issue addressed (sort of) in Karamoussayan v Massachusetts Department of Revenue (In re Karamoussayan), Case No. 22-041, First Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (decided April 11, 2024). Chronology Here’s a chronology. September... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑