Nation-Wide By: Donald L Swanson I recently ran across an Order from a state court, under that state’s receivership statutes, purporting to create a nation-wide injunction (i.e., a “stay”) against any judicial, administrative or other action by any creditor that would affect any of the debtor’s property. And the debtor’s property spans across state lines. My... Continue Reading →
The Need For A Uniform ABC Law
Not uniform (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By Donald L. Swanson Here are some reasons why a uniform law on the subject of assignments for benefit of creditors ("ABC") is needed. Bankruptcy Analogy The need for a uniform ABC law is the same as the need behind the “uniform” bankruptcy law requirement in the U.S. Constitution—only, it’s... Continue Reading →
The Evolving Role of “Unpublished Opinions”—Some History
For publication? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson U.S. Courts of Appeals frequently issue opinions designated “Not for Publication” or “Non-Precedential” or something similar (let’s call them “unpublished opinions”). Question: What, precisely, do such designations mean? Starting Places for Answers: The starting place for answering the question is Fed.R.App.P. 32.1(a), which provides: “A court... Continue Reading →
ABC Statutes: Important-But-Ignored Stakeholders
Ignoring? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson When state legislatures consider a legislative bill, it’s important that they hear from stakeholders who would be affected by that bill. Important ABC Stakeholders When faced with a legislative bill on assignment for benefit of creditors (“ABC”), its important that legislatures hear from a variety of stakeholders,... Continue Reading →
Does A U.S. Supreme Court’s Certiorari Denial Have Precedential Value?
Finding precedents? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari in two cases involving bankruptcy questions: in Barings L.L.C. v. Ag Centre Street Partnership, Case No. 24-1322 (cert. denied on 11/10/2025), the Question Presented is, “Whether an appellate court can materially alter a consummated plan of reorganization without permitting... Continue Reading →
ABC Under The Common Law: An Out-Of-Court Tool For Liquidating Assets With Efficiency & Credibility—But With Court Assistance Available (First Bank v. Unique Marble)
A tool? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L. Swanson An assignment for benefit of creditors (an “ABC”) under the common law is an out-of-court tool for liquidating a business debtor’s assets in an efficient and credible manner. Such a common law tool has been used, effectively and frequently, for many years in such states... Continue Reading →
Advisory Opinion On An Issue Resolved By Stipulation Of The Parties (In re Whittaker—Part 5)
By: Donald L Swanson Here’s a curious thing: an advisory opinion from a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on an issue for which there is no controversy and that is mostly academic. That’s exactly what we have in In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc., Case Nos. 24-2210 & 24-2211 (3rd Cir., decided September 10, 2025)(see... Continue Reading →
Common Law ABCs v. Receiverships
The new Act By: Donald L Swanson Assignments for benefit of creditors (“ABCs”) and receiverships have been utilized effectively for centuries under the common law, side-by-side as separate and distinct and complementary remedies for liquidating assets. Differences Differences between the two are that: receiverships are a court-supervised process initiated by a creditor to dispossess the debtor... Continue Reading →
Can Bankruptcy Courts Ever Create a Federal Common Law Choice-Of-Law-Rule? (In re Whittaker–Part 4)
By: Donald L Swanson It’s not every day that the author of a Circuit Court opinion also authors a concurring opinion. But that’s exactly what happens here: In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc., Case Nos. 24-2210 & 24-2211 (3rd Cir., decided September 10, 2025).## Overview The issue in the concurring opinion deals with this question:... Continue Reading →
Receiverships v. Bankruptcies = The Wild West v. The Rule Of Law
The wild west (photo by Grant Showalter-Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson When comparing proceedings under the Bankruptcy Code with receivership proceedings under state law, there is a similarity: both require intensive court supervision. And there is a huge difference: bankruptcy provides precise rules—lots of them—under an extensive Code and accompanying national and local rules and a... Continue Reading →