Include “Settlement Document Preparation” in Pre-Mediation Checklist to Avoid Wasteful Litigation

By: Donald L. Swanson More than three years of wasted litigation:  that’s what it looks like from the outside. The parties had been fighting, in 2012 and early 2013, about a management agreement for operating a casino. But in June of 2013 the fight changes from a dispute over the management agreement to a dispute... Continue Reading →

The “Sporting Theory of Justice” and the Mediation Profession: Roscoe Pound

By: Donald L. Swanson The response of the [American Bar] Association to that 1976 re-examination of Pound’s criticism was immediate . . . One very important program was aimed at developing alternative methods for resolving disputes.             --Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, February 12, 1984. Roscoe Pound, a young man from Nebraska in 1906, became... Continue Reading →

How the Mediation Profession Began: from Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, 1984 (Part 1 of 2)

By: Donald L. Swanson In days-gone-by, civil lawsuits commonly end in a judgment after trial or an appeal. Today, civil lawsuits commonly end in a mediated settlement. On February 12, 1984, Chief Justice Warren E. Burger explains some early history for such change, to a meeting of the American Bar Association.  His speech begins like... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy’s “Mediation Desert” Needs to Bloom: The Eighth Circuit Example

By: Don Swanson I’m always hesitant to say something doesn’t exist . . . because I might have missed it. --Nevertheless,  I’m going to give it a shot, knowing I can, later, edit-out any error brought to my attention. My focus, here, is on whether bankruptcy courts within the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals system (the... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy’s ADR Rules Have Changed Little Over the Past Century

By: Donald L. Swanson Alternative dispute resolution provisions (“ADR”) involving arbitration and compromises have been part of U.S. bankruptcy laws since at least 1898. ADR Bankruptcy History – From 1898 An 1899 publication of the U.S. “National Bankruptcy Act of 1898” provides for “Arbitration of Controversies” and for “Compromises” in consecutive sections as follows: --“§... Continue Reading →

City of Detroit Withstands Another Challenge to Its Confirmed Bankruptcy Plan

By: Donald L. Swanson Who knew that the City of Detroit’s confirmed bankruptcy plan is still in legal jeopardy? Well . . . it is.  But the jeopardy today is much-less than it was two days ago. Several Detroit pensioners had challenged the City of Detroit’s plan confirmation order because the plan reduced their benefits. ... Continue Reading →

How the Mediation Privilege Works, with an “Opened the Door” Exception: a New Bankruptcy Court Ruling

By: Donald L. Swanson Four law firms are squabbling over how to divide a $20 million attorney fees fund in a bankruptcy case.  [Insert your own derisive epithet here.] The Facts A two-year and multi-session mediation results in settlements of asbestos-related claims.  One such settlement involves a $90 million payment from an insurance company, $70... Continue Reading →

ABI’s “Bankruptcy Mediation” Book: Ethics Rules (Part 2)

By: Donald L. Swanson                                                                              C. Edward Dobbs, Partner at Parker Hudson Rainer & Dobbs, is a leading expert... Continue Reading →

“Mediation Desert” = A Court Without Mediation Rules

By: Donald L. Swanson “Food deserts” are “places where many residents don’t have access to a full-service grocery store within a mile of home in urban areas or 10 miles in rural ones.” --Wall Street Journal, 7/12/2015 “Mediation deserts” are courts that don’t (or won’t) provide access, by rule or statute, to mediation as a... Continue Reading →

Bankruptcy Mediation Rules are Lagging Behind All Other Federal Courts and Agencies (Part 3)

By: Donald L. Swanson Bankruptcy courts have drawn the short mediation straw and are lagging behind: --they don’t have a Federal rule of procedure for mediation. Every other court in the bankruptcy-related court system has such a rule: --The U.S. district courts have Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(c)(2) & 53 [as discussed in this article]. --The U.S. courts... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑