A character for truthfulness (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Here are two questions under Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b): Is a bankruptcy discharge admissible to prove a person’s character for truthfulness or untruthfulness? How about a prior repossession of a person’s automobile? Is that probative of a person’s character for truthfulness or untruthfulness?... Continue Reading →
Avoiding Flow-Through Tax Liability By Giving Up Ownership Shortly Before Bankruptcy Filing? (LeClair v. Tavenner)
Flow-through (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By Donald L. Swanson Question: Can a law firm member avoid flow-through tax liability by giving up ownership in the law firm shortly before it files bankruptcy? The answer is, “Yes.” That’s according to LeClair v. Tavenner, Case No. 23-1133 (4th Cir., decided 2/7/2025). Facts Law Firm operates successfully for several... Continue Reading →
What Happens After A Bankruptcy Sale When The Party In Possession Refuses to Leave? (In re Galleria)
Refuses to leave (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson What happens, after a bankruptcy sale of real estate, when the party in possession of that real estate . . . refuses to leave? We now know. The case is In re Galleria 2425 Owner, L.L.C., Case No. 23-34815 in Southern Texas Bankruptcy Court (decided... Continue Reading →
Arbitration Clause In A Discharged Contract Is Unenforceable—Unless Weaponized (Rogne v. Digital)
A weapon (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Since Debtor “does not now seek to use that agreement as a weapon” against Creditor, Debtor’s “bankruptcy discharge renders the arbitration agreement unenforceable.” Rogne v. Digital Forensics Corp., Case No. 24-cv-2612 (D. Minn. 1/13/2025; Doc. 22, at 7) (emphasis added). Facts Debtor gets a Chapter 7... Continue Reading →
Abusive Pro Se Bankruptcy Filings: A Problem To Be Solved? (Hayes v. U.S. Bank Trust)
A problem to be solved? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson A recent bankruptcy appellate decision by a U.S. District Court highlights a persistent bankruptcy problem: How to deal with pro se filers who abuse the bankruptcy system by repeated filings. The case is Hayes v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., Case Nos. 6:24-cv-00004 &... Continue Reading →
Equitable Mootness Rejected & A Confirmed Plan Provision Excised (In re Serta)
A portion excised? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson Equitable mootness does not prevent the excising (i.e., the surgical removal), on appeal, of an indemnification provision from a confirmed Plan. That’s the ruling of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in Excluded Lenders v. Serta Simmons Bedding, L.L.C. (In re Serta Simmons... Continue Reading →
Getting A “Discretionary Fee” + Hourly Fees Awarded In Bankruptcy: A Road Map? (In re LTL Management)
In re LTL fee application summary By: Donald L Swanson Here is a hard-knocks rule (i.e., a rule learned the hard way) on fees for a court-approved professional in bankruptcy: representing a debtor, committee or trustee in bankruptcy has all the downside of a contingent fee case—but none of the upside. Here is what that means:... Continue Reading →
Winding Down A 97 Year Old Bankruptcy Case (In re Yellow Poplar Lumber)
Art deco, circa 1920s (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L. Swanson This has got to be one of the longest-running bankruptcy cases . . . ever. It was filed on July 17, 1928, and it is being wound-down now. A recent Bankruptcy Court Order in that case (entered January 22, 2025) addresses the question of... Continue Reading →
§ 523(a) Discharge Exceptions & The Corporate Subchapter V Debtor (In re Blok Industries)
Corporations doing business here (photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson “[T]his Court finds that the exceptions to discharge under §523(a) only apply to individuals in Subchapter V.” Spring, et al. v. Davidson and Blok Industries, Inc. (In re Davidson; In re Blok Industries, Inc.; Jointly Administered), Adv. No. 23-3005, Doc. 87, at 15 (Bankr.,... Continue Reading →
Is An Automatic Stay Waiver, In A Pre-Petition Forbearance Agreement, Enforceable? (In re DJK Enterprises)
Enforceable? (Photo by Marilyn Swanson) By: Donald L Swanson “While the pre-petition Debtor may have consented to waiver of the automatic stay in favor of [secured creditor], . . . other creditors did not”; and “The automatic stay is designed to protect both debtors and creditors alike.” In re DJK Enterprises, LLC, Case No. 24-60126, Doc.... Continue Reading →